State Farm Insurance CEO Pay Rises Eighty-Two Percent

Staff                                              Writer
Contributor
Posted by Staff Writer March 20, 2007 10:00 AM

Congratulations to State Farm Insurance Company! Its profits rose almost sixty-four percent (64%) to $5.32 billion dollars last year from $3.24 billion dollars in 2005. In my opinion, during this time, I do not think that State Farm acted like very much of a good neighbor to victims of Hurricane Katrina or to other policy-holders who timely paid premiums thinking they would be protected in times of calamity. Unfortunately, it appears that when needed most, many insurance policy-holders were denied policy benefits last year. In the midst of its record-setting year, according to a recent story on CNN, State Farm apparently adopted a policy to minimize settlement offers for low-impact motor vehicle collisions forcing accident victims to take substantially low settlement offers or spent significant costs in litigation. Moreover, Katrina victims were forced to sue State Farm for refusing to pay property damage claims. By minimizing payouts to its policy-holders, these steps have maximized State Farm's profitability to record levels.

In the midst of these record-setting profits, State Farm's CEO's salary increased at an even faster pace. The CEO's overall salary increased by eighty-two percent (82%) from $6.4 million dollars in 2005 to $11.66 million dollars in 2006.

State Farm's public relations teams continue to champion tort reform initiatives even during such record setting years of profitability. I believe that State Farm and other companies have every right to make a substantial profit and ordinarily I would applaud these efforts. I do not question State Farm's right to earn $5.32 billion dollars nor do I believe that government should intervene to regulate the insurance industry any further. However, I am curious how State Farm or any other insurance company can earn such large profits on the one hand, and still claim losses based on the lack of tort reform initiatives throughout our country on the other. What do you think?

2 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Doug
Posted by Doug
May 04, 2007 11:05 AM

Cheers! God job.. nothing like a free market to allow good executives to get paid!

Keep it up!

Randall Udelman
Posted by Randall Udelman
May 04, 2007 12:36 PM

Doug,

I agree that in a free market, an executive's pay should be tied to company performance. That is why I believe that various tort reform advocates mis-state how supposedly badly insurance companies have been performing over the last several years. Would shareholders allow an executive to receive an eighty-two percent pay raise if the company were losing money and needed tort reform initiatives to stay afloat? My point in this posting was not to criticize pay raises but to show that insurance carriers do not need tort reform to remain profitable.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Phoenix

InjuryBoard Phoenix RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address